you know that whole year of jubilee thing.
yeah, can we go ahead and start doing that again cause i've got some serious school debt.
other thoughts...
i'm kind of glad sarah won...
moana (sp?) just never really seemed like she was into travis...
my guitar is in desperate need of new strings...
i love my wife...
i have a pretty cool dog...
i really can't justify my current lifestyle (but this is a topic for another blog)...
i'm really into what i would call 'big bands' like broken social scene, arcade fire, sufjan stevens, and sigur ros.
did i mention that i love my wife...
i want another tattoo...
maybe two more...
i can't wait to huck in winter park, co. two weeks, baby!
i'm going to make a killer sandwich tonight for dinner.
i wish you could enjoy it with me.
high five
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
Thursday, February 16, 2006
You are George Michael. Your strong moral values
define your actions. You love your family
(some of them too much) and your father's
approval means the world to you.
Arrested Development: Which Bluth Are You?
brought to you by Quizilla
Tuesday, February 14, 2006
chew on this...
"A final fallacy is the maddening practice of many Christians to allegorize works of art, especially works of literature. The practice is deeply engrained in a certain type of Christian temperament. When I assign a Christian critique of a poem, I can confidently expect to find one or more attempts to allegorize the poem to make its details fit events in the life of Christ or Christian doctrine. Why is this so offensive? Because the doctrine of creation tells us that things have value and integrity in terms of what they are as created objects. We do not need to allegorize trees or windows or sidewalks in terms of Christian doctrine before they fulfill their God-given purpose in life. By the same token, we should not attempt to define Christian art in terms of how easily we can allegorize the details to fit Christian doctrines."
-Leland Ryken, The Liberated Imagination
What do you think about this...
"A final fallacy is the maddening practice of many Christians to allegorize works of art, especially works of literature. The practice is deeply engrained in a certain type of Christian temperament. When I assign a Christian critique of a poem, I can confidently expect to find one or more attempts to allegorize the poem to make its details fit events in the life of Christ or Christian doctrine. Why is this so offensive? Because the doctrine of creation tells us that things have value and integrity in terms of what they are as created objects. We do not need to allegorize trees or windows or sidewalks in terms of Christian doctrine before they fulfill their God-given purpose in life. By the same token, we should not attempt to define Christian art in terms of how easily we can allegorize the details to fit Christian doctrines."
-Leland Ryken, The Liberated Imagination
What do you think about this...
Thursday, February 02, 2006
there are somethings i just can't run from.
being metrosexual might be one of them.
although i don't consider myself as dedicated to the lifestyle as others.
i'll pick up a power tool now and again.
as long as i look good doing it.
but i'm comfortable with all that.
so now i have to ask myself.
am i metrospiritual?
i'm about being hip and holistic.
i've even tried surfing.
i'm into whole foods and hybrids.
so according to beliefnet.com i might be boarderline metrospiritual.
are you?
being metrosexual might be one of them.
although i don't consider myself as dedicated to the lifestyle as others.
i'll pick up a power tool now and again.
as long as i look good doing it.
but i'm comfortable with all that.
so now i have to ask myself.
am i metrospiritual?
i'm about being hip and holistic.
i've even tried surfing.
i'm into whole foods and hybrids.
so according to beliefnet.com i might be boarderline metrospiritual.
are you?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)