Tuesday, March 29, 2011



i've been reading though Jeremy Till's book entitled architecture depends. it has been a nice read so far. at one point in the book he states that "all architecture is but waste in transit" meaning that despite an architects best arguments for immortality their buildings will eventually succumb to decay. while this isn't by any means the main thought and argument for his book, it definitely caught my attention. being from the UK, he references the fact that 50% of of waste in UK landfills is construction waste and that only 37% of construction waste is being recycled. till says that, "while architects may dream of their building coming into the world as fully fledged durable items with enduring value, the reality is that they always enter the social realm as transient objects, subject right from the beginning to decline in value and an inexorable slide into the status of rubbish." i don't think architects want to think about this and its easy not to, for most buildings someone creates are not likely to see decay in their designers lifetime.

but i've been thinking a lot about this sort of thing especially in regards to sustainable building practices. builders and architects are being credited more and more for incorporating reclaimed materials into newer buildings. I think this is a great practice, but what i wonder is if there are ways to make reclaiming materials easier. could walls be assembled differently so hammers and saws aren't needed to rip them apart? could we use different materials that could be recycled. i had the opportunity to visit a job site that was in the demolition phase. when the project manager was asked what happens with the used metal studs and sheetrock he somewhat shamefully said they go to the dump. there isn't a way to recycle sheetrock.

so can buildings be constructed to last but at the same time, if cultural trends insist, be disassembled and parts reused? are there ways to create building materials that can be recycled without losing their integrity? a lot of energy and talk are focused on the a buildings performance once it is created. but what about before they building goes up? i guess what i am wondering is that in creating sustainable buildings are we also encouraging more sustainable and healthy was of creating materials?

2 comments:

Free and Living said...

Looking good honey bear!

Free and Living said...

I think you have very good questions in regard to architectural sustainability and recycle-ability. The answers are sometimes not as important if the questions lead us to better stewardship.